Skip to main content

Risk Adjusted Return Metrics

Investors and fund managers often face a dilemma when evaluating investment opportunities: how to measure their performance in a way that accurately reflects both the returns they generated and the level of risk they took on. Risk-adjusted return metrics address this issue by providing a comprehensive picture of an investment's profitability, relative to its volatility.

Understanding Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics​

Risk-adjusted return metrics take into account not just the total return on an investment but also the variability or uncertainty associated with it. This can be particularly useful in situations where investors have different risk tolerance levels and therefore require distinct performance benchmarks. By using these metrics, individuals can make more informed decisions about their investments and gauge whether they're achieving satisfactory outcomes.

Common Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics​

Several key risk-adjusted return metrics are widely used across the financial industry:

  • Sharpe Ratio: This metric calculates the excess return of an investment over its benchmark, relative to its volatility. It's commonly used for comparing the performance of different investments or strategies within a given asset class.

  • Sortino Ratio: Developed as an alternative to the Sharpe Ratio, the Sortino Ratio takes into account only the downside risk (i.e., returns below the expected value) rather than the overall standard deviation. This is particularly useful in volatile markets where investors might be more concerned with protecting their capital during downturns.

  • Treynor Ratio: Similar to the Sharpe Ratio, the Treynor Ratio measures the return on an investment above its risk-free rate relative to its volatility. It's often used to evaluate the performance of a portfolio or fund by comparing it against a benchmark that represents the market as a whole.

  • Information Ratio: This metric calculates the average excess return of an investment over its benchmark, normalized by its tracking error (i.e., the standard deviation of the differences between the returns of the two). It's commonly used in professional portfolio management to evaluate managers' performance against their benchmarks.